Ram Enterprises Vs State of UP And 2 Others

Date: November 20, 2024

Court: High Court
Bench: Allahabad
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Shekhar B. Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Penalty under Section 129(1)(b) Quashed for Failure to Acknowledge Invoice Ownership

Search, Seizure and DetentionPenalty

Summary

The High Court set aside the penalty order dated November 6, 2024, issued under Section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court found the order illegal and unjustified, primarily because the authorities failed to challenge the petitioner's invoice…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the demand of penalty order dated November 6, 2024 passed under Section 129(1)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.