Ram India Company Vs State of U.P. and Another

Date: September 29, 2024

Court: High Court
Bench: Allahabad
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Saumitra Dayal Singh, Donadi Ramesh
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

When ownership of goods is established, taxpayer is entitled to lesser penalty u/s 129(1)(a)

Search, Seizure and DetentionPenalty

Summary

In the case at hand, the petitioner, represented by learned counsel, filed a writ petition seeking relief to quash a penalty order (GST MOV-09) dated August 14, 2024, issued under the provisions of the CGST/IGST Act and related rules. The main conten…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed praying for the following relief: “(i) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned demand of penalty order passed i…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.