India's ₹80k Crore Tax Shock: New Excise Fuels GST 2.0 Fears - Whalesbook
Reaction from Farmers and Retailers
The transition away from the GST compensation cess has exposed potential policy missteps in India's GST 2.0 framework. New excise rates on demerit goods, notably cigarettes, have provoked sharp criticism. Tobacco farmers, particularly in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, argue they already bear a disproportionate tax burden compared to growers of tobacco for bidis or chewing products. A sudden excise shock could devastate these farmers, especially with muted export demand already impacting their regulated crop.Small retailers, including kirana stores and pavement sellers, also face significant challenges. Cigarettes represent a high-value, consistent sales component for these businesses operating on thin margins. A tax-driven price increase risks pricing legal cigarettes out of reach for many consumers, potentially diverting demand to cheaper, illicit alternatives. This creates a survival dilemma for small sellers, who may become targets of enforcement despite upstream smuggling networks remaining insulated.
Investor Concerns and Market Volatility
The market has reacted swiftly to the policy uncertainty. An estimated ₹80,000 crore in market capitalization was eroded as soon as the news broke, impacting corporate balance sheets and household wealth channeled through institutional investors like insurance companies, pension funds, and mutual funds. Traditionally seen as stable assets, these cigarette stocks' volatility now has wider financial implications, particularly in an era of global geopolitical and economic uncertainties.The Illicit Trade Challenge
Industry bodies like FICCI, tracking illicit trade for years, highlight a strong correlation between sharp cigarette tax hikes and the expansion of illegal markets. Historical data from 2012 to 2020 shows India's illicit cigarette share rose from approximately 17% to 28% following repeated excise increases. Duty rate stabilization after 2021 saw this share plateau. International studies concur that enforcement alone cannot dismantle entrenched illicit markets if taxation and affordability pressures continue to push consumers toward illegal options.Policy Calibration: A Path Forward
Economic theory, including the Becker-Murphy model of rational addiction, suggests consumers substitute toward cheaper alternatives when legal prices rise beyond affordability. This creates arbitrage opportunities. The core concern is not taxation itself, but its calibration. While Parliament has approved peak excise rates, the specific notified rates and their sequencing are critical. A sudden, steep increase risks a classic tax shock: brief revenue gains followed by long-term base erosion as activity shifts to the parallel economy, mirroring the Laffer curve principle.A more gradual, phased adjustment over two to three years would allow farmers, retailers, firms, and consumers to adapt. Such an approach would align excise policy with the GST 2.0 lesson: prioritize base widening and friction reduction over aggressive rate hikes to foster formalization. India's recent fiscal maturity in concluding GST 2.0 must be protected. An abrupt excise shock risks reversing these gains by fueling illicit trade, hurting livelihoods, unsettling markets, and ultimately flattening revenues.
Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.