Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd

Date: March 12, 2020

Court: National Anti-Profiteering Authority
Type: Anti-Profiteering
Judge(s)/Member(s): B N Sharma, J C Chauhan, Amand Shah
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Patanjali guilty of profiteering for increasing the base price of its washing powder despite GST Rate reduction

Anti-Profiteering

Summary

While the GST rates were revised from 28% to 18% in 2017, Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd was found to be holding on to the benefits of goods and services tax (GST) rate reduction instead of passing them to the consumers. The NAA noted that Patanjali instead…

1. This report dated 13.12.2018, had been received from the above Applicant i.e. the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 . The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received on 08.06.2018 by the above Applicant from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, to condu…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.