Parshotam Electronics Vs UT of J&K and Ors
Date: September 28, 2025
Subject Matter
Delay in Filing GST Appeal Condoned Due to Petitioner's Surgery
Summary
The petitioner challenged an appellate order dated July 5, 2024, which had dismissed their statutory appeal as time-barred. The original assessment order was dated October 8, 2023, and the appeal was filed on February 28, 2024, resulting in a delay of 20 days beyond the maximum permissible period for condonation under Section 107 of the Jammu and Kashmir GST Act, 2017.
The petitioner sought condonation, arguing that the delay was due to a genuine and critical illness, substantiated by medical records showing a surgery in December 2023 that required pre-operative preparations and post-operative recuperation.
The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the Appellate Authority had acted strictly within the limitations prescribed by Section 107, and the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant the use of the court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
The High Court allowed the writ petition.
Delay Condoned: The court acknowledged that while the statutory Appellate Authority is bound by the limitation period in Section 107, the constitutional courts, in appropriate cases, possess the power to condone the delay. Finding the medical evidence (showing the petitioner was hospitalized for surgery in December 2023) to be a "genuine cause," the court was satisfied that the petitioner was prevented from filing the appeal in time.
Order Set Aside: The court set aside the appellate order dated July 5, 2024, to the extent that it dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation.
Direction: Respondent No. 3 (the Appellate Authority) is directed to decide the appeal on its merits as expeditiously as possible, after affording the petitioner a due opportunity of hearing.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF JAMMU & KASHMIR HIGH COURT
1. The petitioner has filed this petition for quashing the order dated 05.07.2024 passed in a statutory appeal titled “M/s Parshotam Electronics v. State Taxes Officer, Circle-Q, Jammu” whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 08.10.2023 passed by the State Taxes Officer, Circle-Q, Jammu, has been dismissed on account of it being time barred. The petitioner has further sought the condonation of 20 days’ delay in filing the appeal against order dated 08.10.2023.
2. It is urged that the petitioner had undergone a critical surgery that necessitated extensive pre-operation check-ups, preparation and post operative recuperation, as such, he could not file the appeal in time. The petitioner has placed on record documents in respect of the surgery and the treatment undergone by him.
3. The respondents have come up with the response stating therein that the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate a sufficient cause warranting indulgence of this Court to exercise its extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction to grant relief sought by the petitioner. It is further contended that order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the appellate authority is strictly in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 107 of the Jammu and Kashmir GST Act, 2017.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the grounds in the memo of the petition, has drawn the attention of this Court towards the averments made in the memo of appeal to submit that, because of ailment and the surgery, the petitioner could not approach the statutory authority within the limitation prescribed under the Act (supra).
5. Per Contra, Ms. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG has submitted that the order impugned has been passed by respondent No. 2 well within the parameters of law and as such, the writ petition is mis-conceived and deserves dismissal.
6. Heard and perused the record.
7. The record depicts that the petitioner, being aggrieved of order dated 08.10.2023 in respect of certain demands, preferred an appeal against the same on 28.02.2024. In the memo of appeal, the cause projected for not preferring the appeal within the period of limitation was that he had encountered several health issues which affected his ability to discharge professional responsibilities in a timely manner and he underwent a critical surgery in the month of December, 2023, which further necessitated an extended period of recuperation and rehabilitation.
8. It is true that the appellate authority cannot entertain an appeal beyond the period prescribed under Section 107 of the GST but at the same time the said limitation contained in the Act does not prohibit constitutional Courts in appropriate cases from condoning the delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in WP(C) Nos. 1898/2024 and connected matters decided on 17.10.2024.
9. The medical record annexed with the writ petition, not disputed by the respondents, depicts that the petitioner was admitted in Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Narayana Super-speciality Hospital on 20.12.2023 and was discharged on 24.12.2023, during which period, he had undergone a surgery.
10. We are satisfied that the petitioner had a genuine cause in not approaching the statutory authority with appeal against the order of demand within the period of limitation prescribed under the Act (supra).
11. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of by setting aside the order dated 05.07.2024 in respect of dismissal of the appeal on account of it being time barred and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Further, respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the appeal on merits as expeditiously as possible, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Needless to say that we have not examined the merits of the claim of the petitioner.
12. Disposed of.